As a Growth Manager for a rapidly scaling startup, you're tasked with optimizing the company's growth review process.
Based on your understanding of best practices for growth review frequencies and scopes, evaluate the following proposed review structures:
- Structure I: Quarterly reviews focus on reassessing key results and the overall roadmap. Monthly reviews analyze task-level progress and make minor adjustments. Weekly meetings briefly overview targets vs. achievements. Daily automated reports flag significant deviations for immediate attention.
- Structure II: Monthly reviews involve comprehensive roadmap reassessments and major strategic shifts. Weekly meetings dive deep into each team's metrics and experiments. Daily standups discuss every team member's tasks and challenges in detail.
- Structure III: Quarterly reviews briefly touch on high-level metrics. Bi-weekly meetings are used for in-depth analysis of all ongoing experiments and to make significant strategic changes. Daily reviews involve manual checking of all key metrics by the leadership team.
- Structure IV: Annual reviews set the overall strategy. Quarterly meetings assess progress and make minor adjustments. Monthly reviews focus on team-specific metrics. Weekly automated reports summarize key performance indicators without any manual analysis.
Which review structure best aligns with the recommended practices for growth review frequencies and scopes?