How should Information Abstraction Vary Across Different Levels of Growth Reviews?

As a Growth Lead, you're preparing for a series of growth reviews at different organizational levels.

Based on your understanding of information abstraction and best practices for growth reviews, evaluate the following approaches:


  • Approach I: For the quarterly board review, you plan to present a detailed breakdown of all growth experiments conducted in the last three months, including technical specifics of each A/B test.

  • Approach II: In the monthly leadership review, you focus on how the current growth initiatives are impacting user acquisition costs across different channels and discuss potential cross-team collaborations to optimize these efforts.

  • Approach III: During the weekly growth team meeting, you dive deep into the performance of individual growth tactics, using specialized metrics and discussing the nuances of ongoing A/B tests.

  • Approach IV: For the bi-annual board meeting, you prepare a high-level overview focusing on two key narratives: the success of your main user acquisition strategy and its impact on overall business growth.

Which approaches align with the best practices for growth reviews at their respective organizational levels?

Choose the closest answer: